265) The Doctrine of Original Awesomeness, Part 2  (Also, Day 33 -- Reason #33 to revolt against Predatory Capitalism)

265) The Doctrine of Original Awesomeness, Part 2 (Also, Day 33 -- Reason #33 to revolt against Predatory Capitalism)

Imagine how free, joyful, zestful, ALIVE people would feel if they grew up feeling USEFUL and LOVED by the people in their lives; if they grew up feeling they could contribute to their community, that they were respected, that even though they were still learning the skills of life, the adults around them HONOURED and VALUED them.  Imagine how good that would have felt, when you were a kid.

Read More
167) Thanks Mom:  Intergenerational Wisdom, Part 2 -- Friendship and Community
Favourites, Psychology Favourites, Psychology

167) Thanks Mom: Intergenerational Wisdom, Part 2 -- Friendship and Community

I am coming to realize that this Tale of Aloneness was never actually true, and that what made me feel alone was simply Shame, not the reality of being disconnected from people.

When I look at my life from a different angle, then that same passage of time that seemed bereft of social connections was, in fact, RICH with relationships! 

Realizing this has given me a sense of almost something like awe…

Read More
45) Jordan Peterson, Part 2: More problems...; Sub-section 3: Issues of Scale

45) Jordan Peterson, Part 2: More problems...; Sub-section 3: Issues of Scale

We need to ask whether humans predominantly survived the billions of years by functioning at an individual level or at a group level. I believe we are predominantly a group-selected species, and that therefore, our “fundamental human nature” has far more to do with processes that connect us to one another and allow us to function harmoniously together, than with processes of individual power and competitive dominance-striving.

Read More
44) Jordan Peterson, Part 2: More problems...; Subsection 2: Bear Food reasoning in Darwinian/Functionalist clothing

44) Jordan Peterson, Part 2: More problems...; Subsection 2: Bear Food reasoning in Darwinian/Functionalist clothing

In short, just because something WAS functional, or is functional in some ways, does not mean it’s good. Similarly, just because something is ‘natural’ certainly doesn’t mean it’s good.  And just because something is “the winner” in some contest, doesn’t necessarily mean that’s the best outcome, or even a desirable one.  You can’t reason backwards from what exists now, to infer that it is better than what ceased to exist.  Cain was not a better man than Abel; he was just a better murderer.

Read More
43)  Jordan Peterson, Part 2: More Problems with Fundamental Assumptions; Sub-section 1:  The Naturalistic Fallacy

43) Jordan Peterson, Part 2: More Problems with Fundamental Assumptions; Sub-section 1: The Naturalistic Fallacy

The weird thing about getting eaten by bears is that it IS totally natural, as natural as falling off a log or getting a sunburn. No plastic, metals, electricity or advanced computing required. Not a single human invention is necessary, not a single alteration from Nature in the raw.

Lots of other things we have come to see as undesirable are natural. Ebola. Rape. Eating your own babies sometimes.

Reasoning that follows the basic logic of “it’s natural, so it’s good” is understood as the Naturalistic Fallacy, an elemental error in reasoning.

Read More